4200 Parliament Pl., Suite 430, Lanham, MD 20706

Election Security Administration – Fundamentals of Policy and Practice for Election Management Bodies

Learning

  • Objective: To develop fundamental analytical, planning, and implementation skills required to design appropriate and effective measures for preventing, managing, or mediating electoral conflict
  • Participation: The course is designed for election commissioners and staff of Election Management Bodies (EMBs) in countries that have experienced electoral conflict
  • Agenda: Delivered over five days, the program combines lectures, case studies, interactive classroom exercises, and an individual project

Day One

Session One – Basic Concepts of Electoral Security, Conflict, and Justice

The session introduces the definitions and concepts of electoral security, conflict, and justice. A history and global overview of recent electoral conflict is also provided. This overview examines regional trends and focuses on several case studies which are illustrative of a range of electoral conflict issues.  Such issues include the patterns of victimization and perpetration; impact of existing vulnerabilities; and capacity of state stakeholders to protect the process.  

It also identifies the universe of state, non-state, and international stakeholders associated with elections and conflict and their roles.  State stakeholders can be regulatory, security, or judicial in their mandate including the EMB, police, and ordinary courts.  Non-state stakeholders include political parties, civil society and faith-based organizations, and media organizations.  International stakeholders include peacekeeping operations and electoral assistance organizations.

Session Two – Profiling Electoral Conflict Dynamics

The session provides a methodology for electoral threat profiling. This methodology offers an approach to identifying early warning indicators that could trigger electoral conflict. These early factors may be security, political, social, or economic in nature. Security factors include the availability of weapons, politicized security forces, on-going insurgencies; and a post-conflict environment among others.  Political factors include the performance and impartiality of the EMB, electoral and political party system, and election dispute adjudications mechanisms among others.  Social factors include the role of the diaspora, youth bulge, and the status of women among others.  Finally, economic factors include the Per Capita Income, unemployment rate, and disparity in the distribution of wealth. The methodology provides approaches to profile perpetrators, victims, motives, tactics, locations, and intensity.  

Day Two

Session Three – Political Rivalries and Electoral Conflict 

The session explores the role of political parties, electoral systems, and political party systems in electoral conflict, as well as the mechanisms by which EMBs can manage and de-conflict these rivalries, that is, Party Consultative Mechanism (PCMs). PCMs may be statutory or voluntary in mandate.  In some cases, the EMB is the convener of the PCM and the enforcer of the agreements among the participating parties.  As a founding document, PCMs often promulgate a code of conduct for candidates and political parties.  Models of PCMs and code of conduct are examined.  

Session Four – Electoral Dispute Resolution

The session explores the formal and informal mechanisms for adjudicating electoral disputes so that such disputes do not become violent. The session examines the role of EMBs in both formal and informal adjudication processes. Models of formal mechanism are examined by type: special or parallel, unified, or judicial   Cases of international commissions adjudicating electoral disputes in transitional elections are also profiled. 

The session also examines the sources of such disputes through an analytical framework to examine electoral malpractice.  The framework describes four categories of malpractice acts: acts of deception, acts of coercion, acts of destruction, or failures to act.  The session will also examine the penalties that have been issued.  Informal mechanisms include grassroots conflict management committees, religious figures, and traditional leaders and others.

Day Three

Session Five – Electoral Security and Non-State Stakeholders

The session identifies best practices associated with the engagement of non-state stakeholders, principally civil society and faith-based organizations, in peacebuilding campaigns to counter spoilers in the public arena.  Activities include peace advocacy campaigns, social networking sites, and media messaging among others.  These organizations may also engage in electoral monitoring, and this session examines the profiles of some organizations that do conduct such monitoring, their methodologies and outputs.  This session also examines practices in providing services and compensation for victims of electoral violence and their families.  Examples of legal, counseling and medical services are discussed.   

Session Six – Electoral Security Planning and Administration

The session provides the fundamentals and best practices of electoral security administration for EMBs. These fundamentals include developing an electoral security concept based upon the profile of the threats and the resources available. Electoral security administration may also require the EMB to initiate inter-agency task forces to coordinate among military, police, and electoral stakeholders. 

Day Four

Participants are tasked with developing electoral security plans for their next electoral cycle. This plan includes an assessment of the possible threats, outreach mechanisms for political parties and non-state stakeholders, and an organizational plan for EMB/security force coordination and management.  The planning document is divided into the following sections.
  • Identify potential vulnerabilities that may lead to electoral conflict
  • Analyze and profile electoral conflict dynamics based on previous incidents
  • Identify mitigating factors that can be leveraged to reduce electoral conflict
  • Identify electoral security policies and programs to be implemented and assess their intended impact on electoral conflict
  • Assign and schedule institutional responsibilities for implementing these policies and programs among Election Management Bodies (EMBs), police, and other state stakeholders
  • Identify long-term solutions to electoral conflict

Day Five

Participants make presentations to the plenary on their electoral security plans.

For More Information:
Heather Heyer
Head of Programs
U.S. Int. Center for Electoral Support
heather.heyer@usices.org